In other words, two companies can swap their debt amounts, paying the interest in dollars other than their own. 6 Non-banks in the United States had $866 billion in foreign currency debt in 2021 (US Treasury et al (2022)). About 5% of the $3.4 trillion in US imports were foreign currency-invoiced (Boz (2020)). Compared with $26 trillion in dollar debt, any borrowing of dollars in swaps/forwards to hedge these payables may be considered as a rounding error. This feature revisits Borio et al (2017), drawing on the comprehensive data in the 2022 BIS Triennial Survey.
- They are of a size similar to, and probably exceeding, the $10.7 trillion of on-balance sheet debt.
- Markets calmed only after coordinated central bank swap lines to supply dollars to non-US banks became unlimited in October 2008.
- To do this they typically use “tom-next” swaps, buying (or selling) a foreign amount settling tomorrow, and then doing the opposite, selling (or buying) it back settling the day after.
- The off-balance sheet US dollar debt of non-banks outside the United States substantially exceeds their on-balance sheet debt and has been growing faster.
For perspective, this figure approaches that of world GDP ($75 trillion), exceeds that of global portfolio stocks ($44 trillion) or international bank claims ($32 trillion), and is almost triple the value of global trade ($21 trillion). One reason is that forwards and swaps are treated as derivatives, so that only the net value is recorded at fair value, while repurchase transactions are not. Since the value of the forward claim exchanged at inception is the same, the fair value of the contract is zero and it changes only with variations in exchange rates.
FX swaps/forwards and currency swaps: some stylised facts
Similarly, Company B no longer has to borrow funds from American institutions at 9%, but realizes the 4% borrowing cost incurred by its swap counterparty. Under this scenario, Company B actually managed to reduce its cost of debt by more than half. Instead of borrowing from international banks, both companies borrow domestically and lend to one another at the lower rate. The diagram below depicts the general characteristics of the currency swap. In a foreign currency swap, each party to the agreement pays interest on the the other’s loan principal amounts throughout the length of the agreement.
Once a foreign exchange transaction settles, the holder is left with a positive (or “long”) position in one currency and a negative (or “short”) position in another. In order to collect or pay any overnight interest due on these foreign balances, at the end of every day institutions will close out any foreign balances and re-institute them for the following day. To do this they typically use “tom-next” swaps, buying (or selling) a foreign amount settling tomorrow, and then doing the opposite, selling (or buying) it back settling the day after. The parties enter into a foreign exchange swap today with a maturity of six months. They agree to swap 1,000,000 EUR, or equivalently 1,500,000 CAD at the spot rate of 1.5 EUR/CAD.
Understanding Foreign Currency Swaps
Assuming that the net FX position is zero, as typically encouraged by bank supervisors, we estimate the net use of swaps as the net positions in a given currency. Moreover, as mentioned before, the resulting net positions are likely to underestimate the gross debt positions, especially for dealer banks. Currency swaps are over-the-counter derivatives that serve two main purposes.
Some might say that if the global market for FX swaps tanks, then it’s all over anyway. Others might suggest that central banks have dealt with these scenarios in the past. It’s just another thing to worry about, for those already concerned about these troubling markets. The most common[citation needed] use of foreign exchange swaps is for institutions to fund their foreign exchange balances. The forward rate is the exchange rate on a future transaction, determined between the parties, and is usually based on the expectations of the relative appreciation/depreciation of the currencies.
The interest collected or paid every night is referred to as the cost of carry. As currency traders know roughly how much holding a currency position will make or cost on a daily basis, specific trades are put on based on this; these are referred to as carry trades. 3 Dealers maintain the secured nature by agreeing to credit support annexes. The mark-to-market loser regularly hands over cash or securities (“variation margin”) to the mark-to-market winner. Over 1.8 million professionals use CFI to learn accounting, financial analysis, modeling and more. Start with a free account to explore 20+ always-free courses and hundreds of finance templates and cheat sheets.
Stock Market Crash Alert: Mark Your Calendars for March 20
See also Aldasoro et al (2017) for evidence of differential pricing in dollar funding markets; Japanese banks pay a premium to borrow via repos from US money market funds. Post-GFC, these European banks’ aggregate dollar borrowing via FX swaps declined, along with the size of their dollar assets. In particular, German, Swiss and UK banks reduced their combined reliance on FX swaps from $580 billion in 2007 to less than $130 billion by end-Q1 2017. For most investors, it’s unclear what the ultimate impact of an FX swap crisis would be.
We and our partners process data to provide:
Every day, trillions of dollars are borrowed and lent in various currencies. But foreign exchange (FX) derivatives, mainly FX swaps, currency swaps and the closely related forwards, also create debt-like obligations. For the US dollar alone, contracts worth tens of trillions of dollars stand open and trillions change hands daily. The missing dollar debt from FX swaps/forwards and currency swaps is huge, adding to the vulnerabilities created by on-balance sheet dollar debts of non-US borrowers. It has reached $26 trillion for non-banks outside the United States, double their on-balance sheet debt. Moreover, it has grown smartly since 2016, despite the often significant premium demanded on dollar swap funding (Borio et al (2016)).
When the swap is over, if principal amounts were exchanged, they are exchanged once more at the agreed upon rate (which would avoid transaction risk) or the spot rate. 20 In some cases, the authorities finance some foreign exchange reserves by swapping domestic currency into dollars. Whereas dollar-lending central banks typically have a long FX position, dollar-borrowing central banks can hold reserves while also avoiding a long FX position. Fourth, non-bank private sector entities can provide hundreds of billions of dollars. In June 2014, the then largest US bond fund, PIMCO’s Total Return Fund, reported $101 billion in currency forwards, no less than 45% of its net assets (Kreicher and McCauley (2016)).
17 BIS data provide only a partial picture of the dollar books of banks headquartered in China, Korea, Russia and many other countries. An aggregation of these banks’ observed dollar positions, however, suggests that they are, overall, net borrowers of dollars via FX swaps, pointing to an even wider gap than shown in Graph 6. BIS data do not capture at all the dollar positions of other non-reporting banking systems, some of which may be dollar lenders via FX swaps (eg oil-producing countries). The maturity of the instruments is largely short-term (Graph 1, centre and right-hand panel). At end-2016, three quarters of positions had a maturity of less than one year and only a few percentage points exceeded five years.
What Does $80 Trillion of Hidden FX Swap Debt Mean?
Turnover data show that the modal forward (a customer-facing instrument) matures between one week and one year while the modal swap (an inter-dealer instrument) within a week (BIS (2016)). The long-term share has risen since the 2000s, as capital markets have boomed. The off-balance sheet US dollar https://www.tradebot.online/ debt of non-banks outside the United States substantially exceeds their on-balance sheet debt and has been growing faster. At end-June 2022, the missing debt amounted to as much as double the on-balance sheet component (Graph 2.B), which was estimated at “only” $13 trillion (Graph 2.A).
Many investors who are already taking bearish positions may look to such data as the latest reason to sell. There’s a potential $80 trillion of capital that’s being held in shadow banks and non-US banks, essentially hidden from the ledgers of the BIS. This is a staggering amount of money, with some estimates putting the amount at roughly 14% of all financial assets globally.